HBS Managing Innovation Winter 2012 Course

12Feb/1216

Collaborate to Innovate: A Powerful but Challenging Proposition

As we’ve explored sources of innovation, I’ve become increasingly convinced of the link between collaboration and successful innovation. This is not a revelation; many companies recognize the potential for collaboration among their employees, with experts outside their industry, and with their customers. But often, these companies fail to reach that potential. What is it about collaboration’s role in the innovation process that is so enticing and yet so difficult to capture?

Innovation is about looking at problems from new angles (InnoCentive), combining expertise in unique ways (Apple, TNZ), and developing knowledge that is not well understood (BBA). On the “front end” of the process, collaboration encourages innovation by bringing people together to explore different perspectives on a problem and discover solutions that go beyond what any individual could have done alone (even Steve Jobs … maybe). Collaboration thus can expand the “design space” and drive new solutions into the innovation funnel.

However, innovative solutions are not necessarily successful innovations. As with most things, the trick is in the execution. Apple’s products wouldn’t be as successful without alignment and skill development around new sales channels, platform expansion, and supply-chain management. In contrast, many of the solutions that Bang & Olufsen’s Idealab generated failed in part because of their incompatibility with design and manufacturing processes finely tuned to traditional strategy and priorities. Collaboration can help here as well.

According to Forrester, engagement is driven by “four Is”: involvement, interaction, intimacy and influence. When collaboration is introduced constructively into the innovation process, employees whose actions may determine an innovation’s success or failure experience all four. Engagement leads to buy-in: understanding of, acceptance of, and commitment to a specific course of action. Buy-in, in turn, enables organizational alignment, without which nothing much gets done. These elements of execution are particularly crucial in bringing breakthrough innovations to market, which often require challenging old ways of thinking and behaving. Collaboration’s role in this process cannot be overlooked.

Collaboration can be a catalyst for a chain reaction of successful innovation:

Recognition of collaboration’s potential has led InnoCentive to explore how it might encourage and facilitate connections among its solvers, BBA to consider turning its customers into collaborators, and BMW to design buildings to encourage interaction. However, collaboration is much more difficult and complex than implied by the offhand manner in which the term is commonly used. Many companies have struggled to incorporate the concept into their innovation processes.Why?

Effective collaboration requires more than simply putting people with different perspectives in a room together and waiting for the next big thing to emerge. True collaboration, whether with colleagues, customers, or outside partners, requires discipline and practice. Structure and constraints are crucial to ensure collaborators work toward a valuable outcome. Big egos and creative geniuses must agree to ground rules that may threaten their usually privileged positions, and must work to understand the perspectives of others in ways they have willfully rejected in the past. Even organizations that acknowledge the need for a certain amount of messiness and failure in the innovation process may balk at the introduction of structured collaboration to this process: it requires a commitment of time and resources whose ROI is difficult to measure, and introduces the risk of misunderstandings, hurt feelings, and animosity. Faced with these challenges, it is no wonder that InnoCentive would think twice about taking responsibility for solver collaboration, or that Bang & Olufsen chose to treat Idealab as an awkward appendage to its process rather than attempting to foster true collaboration between Christopher Sorensen and David Lewis.

When the elements mentioned above are not present, collaboration often does not get off the ground or stalls early. However, there is an additional risk once an organization does commit to collaboration as a source of innovation: compromise. Collaboration is at its most powerful when it enables parties with different perspectives and competing priorities to uncover the win-win solutions at the heart of breakthrough innovation. Tradeoffs are inherent in the innovation process, but must be carefully evaluated and chosen. There is danger in interpreting the imperative to collaborate as a need to compromise, limiting the potential for breakthrough innovations and the support they require to get to market.

It seems clear that collaboration can be a powerful driver of successful innovation, but it is less clear that this is worth the investment and risks. Have you seen companies wrestle with and/or master these challenges? Are there strategies and best practices that effectively weave collaboration deeply into the fabric of the innovation process?

Posted by Matt Noble

Comments (16) Trackbacks (1)
  1. You point out that poorly-managed collaboration generates compromise. The Jan 30 New Yorker has in interesting article by Jonah Lehrer that details sensitive balance between collaborative thinking that leads to a consensus around a ground-breaking outlier and brainstorming that encourages a convergence to some centrist idea. The two big recommendations? Cross-pollination among individuals with diverse backgrounds is key, and while the standard brainstorming method encourages positive responses to all ideas, a methodology that promotes critical discussion generates more ideas. This may be the genius of InnoCentive: the anonymity promotes both unabashed offering of ideas and (in a collaborative setting) critical responses to it; and the platform itself collects ideas from a diverse group.

  2. Nice recognition that innovation involves excellence and alignment across functional areas. Fully agree that collaboration of all sorts is critical to successful innovation. Any thoughts about how collaboration with partners, whether through strategic alliances or potentially the development of a partner ecosystem, might further innovative capabilities and/or introduce new challenges?

  3. A great point, Matt. It is especially poignant given today’s case on OpenIDEO, where it seems the discipline and shepherding around the collaboration is the lynchpin of effective innovation. You said it best, “True collaboration, whether with colleagues, customers, or outside partners, requires discipline and practice.”

    To your question if there are best practices that effectively weave collaboration into innovation, I found this simple and to the point post very relevant:
    - http://collaborativeinnovation.org/2012/02/ciscos-collaboration-success-and-failure/

    Essentially, it’s a reminder to decrease the cost of collaboration. Only if the cost of collaboration is low enough will people collaborate and thus manage it as part of the innovation process, as your post nicely describes. Using tools like a whitelabel OpenIDEO platform is one such way, and encouraging opportunities to collaborate is another (as I highlighted in my post about Steve Jobs’ belief in creating building spaces for just that purpose).

    I look forward to lots of best practices as the adoption of collaborative innovation increases.

  4. Cool, there’s really some superb ideas on right here a few of my subscribers may perhaps find this related, I will deliver them a website link, countless thank you.

  5. Admiring the time and effort you put into your website and in depth information you provide. It’s awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed material. Wonderful read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  6. Cross-pollination between individuals with different backgrounds is the key, and while the standard method of brainstorming that encourages a positive response to all ideas, methodologies that promote critical discussion to generate more ideas.
    New Honda Balikpapan

  7. Nice recognition that innovation involves excellence and alignment across functional areas. Fully agree that collaboration of all sorts is critical to successful innovation. Jual Celana Chino

  8. I’ve been surfing online greater than 3 hours nowadays, but I never found any fascinating article like yours. It’s pretty value enough for me. Personally, if all website owners and bloggers made excellent content as you probably did, the net can be a lot more helpful than ever before.

  9. Good Collaborate to Innovate: A Powerful but Challenging Proposition

  10. I feel at home on this site in a long time, because a lot of information that is interesting, good work fella.

  11. i had to try and do was write-up several comments on the houseparty site, invite

  12. The fundamental purpose of signing for an ecommerce website hosting package is to recognize your specific goals and objectives, and how best will you be able to achieve them by utilizing the internet hosting package.

  13. It seems to be accepted wisdom that online shopping offers many opportunities for buying better products and services. In order to explain this, it’s certainly helpful to consider the advantages that are offered by such an approach.

  14. As you are probably aware of, construction is a long and complex process with the difficulty level and risk of failure increasing as the job gets bigger. As the construction manager,

  15. Your post is incredibly useful, I was previously pleased, continue to keep making intriguing that

  16. On the other hand, modern alternatives usually are not always profitable inventions. As with the majority of things, the was in the particular setup. Apple’s goods wouldn’t become because profitable with out position as well as talent progress close to brand new sales channels, system expansion, as well as supply-chain supervision. As opposed, the majority of the alternatives in which Boom & Olufsen’s Idealab produced failed simply for their incompatibility having style as well as production processes quickly tuned to help conventional tactic as well as points. Relationship can assist the following too.


Leave a comment